of evolution maintains that life on Earth came about as the
result of chance and emerged by itself from natural conditions.
This theory is not a scientific law or a proven fact. Underneath
its scientific façade it is a materialist worldview that Darwinists
are trying to impose on society. The bases of this theory,
which has been disproved by science in every field, are suggestions
and propaganda methods consisting of deceptions, falsehood,
contradiction, cheating, and sleight of hand.
The theory of evolution was put forward as an
imaginary hypothesis in the context of the primitive scientific
understanding of the nineteenth century, and to this day it
has not been backed up by any scientific discovery or experiment.
On the contrary, all the methods employed to confirm the theory
have merely proven its invalidity.
However, even today many people think that the
theory is a proven fact, like the force of gravity or the
law of buoyancy. Because, as stated at the beginning, the
true nature of the theory of evolution is very different from
what is usually supposed. For this reason, some people do
not know what rotten foundations this theory has, how it is
disproved by science at every turn, and how evolutionists
are trying to keep it alive in its death throes. Evolutionists
have no other support than unconfirmed hypotheses, biased
and unrealistic observations, and imaginary drawings, methods
of psychological suggestion, countless falsehoods, and sleight-of-hand
Today, such branches of science as paleontology,
genetics, biochemistry, and molecular biology have proven
that it is quite impossible for life to come about as a result
of chance and to emerge by itself from natural conditions.
The living cell, it is commonly agreed by the world of science,
is the most complex structure that mankind has so far encountered.
Modern science has revealed that just one living cell has
a much more complex structure and mutually interconnected
complicated systems than a large city. Such a complex structure
can only function if all its separate parts emerge at the
same time and in full working order. Otherwise, it will serve
no purpose, and will fall apart over time and disappear. We
cannot expect that its parts developed by chance over millions
of years as claimed by the theory of evolution. For that reason,
the complex design in just one cell clearly shows that God
Nothing was known in Darwin's
time about the complex structure of the cell
However, those who defend materialist philosophy
do not want to accept the fact of creation for various ideological
reasons. That is because the existence and spread of societies
living in the light of that beautiful morality that true religion
offers to man by means of God's commands and prohibitions
is not in these materialists' interests. Masses devoid of
any spiritual and moral values suit these people far better,
since they can manipulate them for their own worldly interests.
For this reason, they try to impose the theory of evolution,
which encourages the lie that mankind was not created but
rather emerged by chance and evolved from animals, and to
keep it alive at whatever costs. Despite all the clear scientific
proof that destroys the theory of evolution and confirms the
fact of creation, they abandon all reason and logic and defend
this nonsense at every available opportunity.
It has actually been proved that it is impossible
for the first living cell, or even just one of the millions
of protein molecules in that cell, to have come about by
chance. This has been demonstrated not only by experiments
and observations, but also by mathematical calculations
of probability. In other words, evolution collapses at the
very first step: that of explaining the emergence of the
first living cell.
Not only could the cell, the smallest unit of
life, never have come about by chance in the primitive and
uncontrolled conditions in the early days of the Earth, as
evolutionists would have us believe, it cannot even be synthesized
in the most advanced laboratories of the twentieth century.
Amino acids, the building blocks of the proteins that make
up the living cell, cannot of themselves build such organelles
in the cell as mitochondria, ribosomes, cell membranes, or
the endoplasmic reticulum, let alone a whole cell. For this
reason, the claim that evolution brought about the first cell
by chance remains the product of a fantasy based entirely
The living cell, which still harbours many secrets
that have not been explained, is one of the major difficulties
facing the theory of evolution.
Another terrible dilemma from the point of view
of evolution is the DNA molecule in the nucleus of the living
cell, a coding system with 3.5 billion units containing all
the details of life. DNA was first discovered using X-ray
crystallography in the late 1940s and early 1950s, and is
a giant molecule with a superb plan and design. For many years,
Francis Crick, a Nobel-prize laureate, believed in the theory
of molecular evolution, but eventually even he had to admit
to himself that such a complex molecule could not have emerged
spontaneously by chance, as the result of an evolutionary
Examples of the complex structures
in cells: Right above, a ribosome where the protein
synthesis takes place in the cell. Left above, a "nucleosome"
which packages DNA units in the chromosome. The cell
contains many very complex structures and systems such
as these, and even more complex ones. The realisation
that these complex structures, discovered by technology
as it advanced, could not have come about by chance
has placed evolutionists in a dilemma they can never
An honest man, armed with
all the knowledge available to us now, could only state
that, in some sense, the origin of life appears at the moment
to be almost a miracle.1
The Turkish evolutionist Professor Ali Demirsoy
was forced to make the following confession on the issue:
In fact, the probability
of the formation of a protein and a nucleic acid (DNA-RNA)
is a probability way beyond estimating. Furthermore, the
chance of the emergence of a certain protein chain is so
slight as to be called astronomic. 2
Homer Jacobson, Professor Emeritus
of Chemistry, makes the following admission regarding how
impossible it is for life to have come about by chance:
Directions for the reproduction of plans,
for energy and the extraction of parts from the current
environment, for the growth sequence, and for the effector
mechanism translating instructions into growth-all had to
be simultaneously present at that moment [when life began].
This combination of events has seemed an incredibly unlikely
From the time Darwin's theory
came to dominate science to the present day, paleontology
has considered the theory its very basis. Despite this,
however, excavations in many parts of the world have
produced results that conflict with the theory instead
of backing it up. Fossils show that different living
groups emerged suddenly with all their features intact-in
other words that they were created.
termites preserved in amber. They are indistinguishable
from termites living in our time.
The fossil record represents another crushing
defeat for the theory of evolution. Among all the fossils
discovered over the years, there is not one trace of the intermediate
forms that would be necessary if living things were to have
evolved stage by stage from simple species to more complex
ones, as the theory of evolution claims. If such creatures
had really existed, there would have been millions, even billions,
of them. More importantly, the remains of these creatures
should be present in the fossil record. If these intermediate
forms had ever really existed, their numbers would be even
greater than the number of animal species we know today, and
everywhere the world should be full of their fossil remains.
Evolutionists look for these intermediate forms in all the
feverish fossil research that has been carried out since the
nineteenth century. However, there has been no trace of these
intermediate forms, despite all the eager searching for the
last 150 years.
In short, the fossil record shows that living
species emerged suddenly and perfectly formed, not by following
a process from primitive forms to advanced ones as evolution
Evolutionists have tried very hard to find evidence
for their theory or so, but have actually proved by their
own hand that no evolutionary process could have been possible.
In conclusion, modern science reveals the following indisputable
fact: Living things did not emerge as the result of
blind chance, but God created them.
Francis Crick, Life Itself: Its Origin and Nature,
New York, Simon & Schuster, 1981, p. 88
Ali Demirsoy, Kalitim ve Evrim (Inheritance and Evolution),
Meteksan Publishing Co., Ankara, 1984, p. 39
Homer Jacobson, "Information, Reproduction and the Origin
of Life," American Scientist, January 1955, p. 121.