The "tree of life" drawn by
the evolutionary biologist Ernst Haeckel in 1866. |
Let us first consider the Darwinist hypothesis.
As we know, Darwinism proposes that life developed from one
single common ancestor, and took on all its varieties by a
series of tiny changes. In that case, life should first have
emerged in very similar and simple forms. And according to
the same theory, the differentiation between, and growing
complexity in, living things must have happened in parallel
over time.
In short, according to Darwinism, life must be
like a tree, with a common root, subsequently splitting up
into different branches. And this hypothesis is constantly
emphasized in Darwinist sources, where the concept of the
"tree of life" is frequently employed. According to this tree
concept, phyla-the fundamental units of classification between
living things-came about by stages, as in the diagram to the
left. According to Darwinism, one phylum must first emerge,
and then the other phyla must slowly come about with minute
changes over very long periods of time. The Darwinist hypothesis
is that the number of animal phyla must have gradually increased
in number. The diagram to the left shows the gradual increase
in the number of animal phyla according to the Darwinian view.
According to Darwinism, life must have developed
in this way. But is this really how it happened?
Definitely not. Quite the contrary:
animals have been very different and complex since the moment
they first emerged. All the animal phyla known today
emerged at the same time, in the middle of the geological
period known as the Cambrian Age. The Cambrian Age
is a geological period estimated to have lasted some 65 million
years, approximately between 570 to 505 million years ago.
But the period of the abrupt appearance of major animal groups
fit in an even shorter phase of the Cambrian, often referred
to as the "Cambrian explosion." Stephen C. Meyer, P. A. Nelson,
and Paul Chien, in a 2001 article based on a detailed literature
survey, dated 2001, note that the "Cambrian explosion occurred
within an exceedingly narrow window of geologic time, lasting
no more than 5 million years."56
THE
FOSSIL RECORD DENIES THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION
| |
The
theory of evolution maintains that different
groups of living things (phyla) developed from
a common ancestor and grew apart with the passing
of time. The diagram left states this claim:
According to Darwinism, living things grew apart
from one another like the branches on a tree.
But
the fossil record shows just the opposite. As
can be seen from the diagram left, different
groups of living things emerged suddenly with
their different structures. Some 100 phyla suddenly
emerged in the Cambrian Age. Subsequently, the
number of these fell rather than rose (because
some phyla became extinct).
|
|
Before then, there is no trace in the fossil
record of anything apart from single-celled creatures and
a few very primitive multicellular ones. All animal phyla
emerged completely formed and all at once, in the very short
period of time represented by the Cambrian explosion. (Five
million years is a very short time in geological terms!)
The fossils found in Cambrian rocks belong to
very different creatures, such as snails, trilobites, sponges,
jellyfish, starfish, shellfish, etc. Most of the creatures
in this layer have complex systems and advanced structures,
such as eyes, gills, and circulatory systems, exactly the
same as those in modern specimens. These structures are at
one and the same time very advanced, and very different.
Richard Monastersky, a staff writer
at ScienceNews magazine states the following about
the "Cambrian explosion," which is a deathtrap for evolutionary
theory:
A half-billion years
ago, ...the remarkably complex forms of animals we see today
suddenly appeared. This moment, right at the start of Earth's
Cambrian Period, some 550 million years ago, marks the evolutionary
explosion that filled the seas with the world's first complex
creatures.57
The same article also quotes
Jan Bergström, a paleontologist who studied the early Cambrian
deposits in Chengjiang, China, as saying, "The Chengyiang
fauna demonstrates that the large animal phyla of today were
present already in the early Cambrian and that they were as
distinct from each other as they are today."58

This illustration portrays
living things with complex structures from the Cambrian
Age. The emergence of such different creatures with
no preceding ancestors completely invalidates Darwinist
theory. |
How the Earth came to overflow with such a great
number of animal species all of a sudden, and how these distinct
types of species with no common ancestors could have emerged,
is a question that remains unanswered by evolutionists. The
Oxford University zoologist Richard Dawkins, one of the foremost
advocates of evolutionist thought in the world, comments on
this reality that undermines the very foundation of all the
arguments he has been defending:
For example the Cambrian
strata of rocks… are the oldest ones in which we find most
of the major invertebrate groups. And we find many of them
already in an advanced state of evolution, the very first
time they appear. It is as though they were just
planted there, without any evolutionary history.59
Phillip Johnson, a professor at the University
of California at Berkeley who is also one of the world's foremost
critics of Darwinism, describes the contradiction between
this paleontological truth and Darwinism:
Darwinian theory predicts
a "cone of increasing diversity," as the first living organism,
or first animal species, gradually and continually diversified
to create the higher levels of taxonomic order. The animal
fossil record more resembles such a cone turned upside down,
with the phyla present at the start and thereafter decreasing.60
A fossil from the Cambrian
Age. |
As Phillip Johnson has revealed, far from its
being the case that phyla came about by stages, in reality
they all came into being at once, and some of them even became
extinct in later periods. The diagrams on page 53 reveal the
truth that the fossil record has revealed concerning the origin
of phyla.
As we can see, in the Precambrian Age there were
three different phyla consisting of single-cell creatures.
But in the Cambrian Age, some 60 to 100 different animal phyla
emerged all of a sudden. In the age that followed, some of
these phyla became extinct, and only a few have come down
to our day.
The well-known paleontologist Roger Lewin discusses
this extraordinary fact, which totally demolishes all the
Darwinist assumptions about the history of life:
Described recently as
"the most important evolutionary event during the entire
history of the Metazoa," the Cambrian explosion established
virtually all the major animal body forms - Baupläne or
phyla - that would exist thereafter, including many that
were "weeded out" and became extinct. Compared with the
30 or so extant phyla, some people estimate that the Cambrian
explosion may have generated as many as 100.61
INTERESTING SPINES: One of the
creatures which suddenly emerged in the Cambrian Age
was Hallucigenia, seen at top left. And as with many
other Cambrian fossils, like the one at the right it
has spines or a hard shell to protect it from attack
by enemies. The question that evolutionists cannot answer
is, "How could they have come by such an effective
defense system at a time when there were no predators
around?" The lack of predators at the time makes
it impossible to explain the matter in terms of natural
selection.
|
  
56 Stephen
C. Meyer, P. A. Nelson, and Paul Chien, The Cambrian Explosion:
Biology's Big Bang, 2001, p. 2.
57 Richard Monastersky,
"Mysteries of the Orient," Discover, April 1993,
p. 40. (emphasis added)
58 Richard Monastersky,
"Mysteries of the Orient," Discover, April 1993,
p. 40.
59 Richard Dawkins,
The Blind Watchmaker, W. W. Norton, London, 1986,
p. 229. (emphasis added)
60 Phillip E.
Johnson, "Darwinism's Rules of Reasoning," in Darwinism: Science
or Philosophy by Buell Hearn, Foundation for Thought and Ethics,
1994, p. 12. (emphasis added)
61 R. Lewin,
Science, vol. 241, 15 July 1988, p. 291. (emphasis
added) |